Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190625
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 17:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 370
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 105
Parallax 109
90% 108 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 91.4
86% 107 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SF-SSD-120-PCB-RIN 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 268 328 346 336 345 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 463
Write 340
Mixed 336
SusWrite 313
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 10.7
109% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 18.6
61% 128 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
740GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 188 188 189 189 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 189
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 182
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series Kingston 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.9
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback