Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	426% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory	60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '22 at 13:29
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	78%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11980HK 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 72.3 1-Core 173 2-Core 330 101% 192 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 974 90% 751 Pts	64-Core 1,354 84% 1,354 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A3000 Laptop GPU 872 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 130D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1740 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	13% Very poor	Lighting 16 Reflection 19.2 Parallax 13.5 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 11.9 Splatting 12.4 13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 105%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXA7401Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2719 1944 1935 1635 1797 1952 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	426% Outstanding	Read 2,898 Write 3,374 Mixed 3066 SusWrite 1997 639% 2,834 MB/s	4K Read 85.4 4K Write 223 4K Mixed 119 400% 143 MB/s	DQ Read 1,557 DQ Write 1,331 DQ Mixed 1,425 1,073% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 426% Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB 21,743 User benchmarks, average bench 345% 255GB free Firmware: GXA7401Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 2425 2311 2100 2103 1841 1616 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	409% Outstanding	Read 2,557 Write 2,389 Mixed 2,336 SusWrite 2066 526% 2,337 MB/s	4K Read 74.8 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 105 352% 126 MB/s	DQ Read 1,690 DQ Write 1522 DQ Mixed 1,533 1,170% 1,581 MB/s
Poor: 192% ↑ This bench: 409% Great: 444%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB 2,607 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 33.6 105% 36.8 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 41.9 SC Mixed 19.9 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

CPU
Core i9-11980HKIntelBench 93%, 1,108 samples	10x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	7x
RTX A3000 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 90%, 872 samples	3x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TBSamsungBench 345%, 21,743 samples	7x
MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TBSamsungBench 391%, 3,483 samples	2x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $75Bench 200%, 52,084 samples	1x

RAM
M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 92%, 2,607 samples	3x
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 86%, 11,002 samples	2x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16