Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 61.9
1-Core 168
2-Core 330
96% 187 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 913
92% 749 Pts
64-Core 1,358
84% 1,358 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 130D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1694
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 16.7
17% 18.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 12.9
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
664GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3274 2552 1852 1844 1861 1851 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2824
Write 3,288
Mixed 2,978
SusWrite 2,206
638% 2,824 MB/s
4K Read 80.3
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 112
371% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 1,576
DQ Write 1198
DQ Mixed 1,342
1,016% 1,372 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 425%
Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2381 2411 2408 2046 1433 1507 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,531
Write 2401
Mixed 2,329
SusWrite 2031
523% 2,323 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 80.5
274% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1643
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 1,444
1,089% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 375%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
91% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 33.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 19.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback