Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 10:54
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 321
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 838
89% 711 Pts
64-Core 1,265
78% 1,265 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 130D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1740 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 16.7
Parallax 16.1
16% 17.5 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 12
Splatting 12.6
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 15%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
660GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2928 1963 1898 1899 1898 1930 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 2824
Write 3,372
Mixed 3,075
SusWrite 2,086
641% 2,839 MB/s
4K Read 85.2
4K Write 215
4K Mixed 121
398% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1557
DQ Write 1,179
DQ Mixed 1,308
994% 1,348 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 425%
Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
382GB free
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2364 2321 1906 1722 1718 1708 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
396% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2,310
Mixed 2,331
SusWrite 1,957
512% 2,276 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 198
4K Mixed 109
359% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,608
DQ Write 1,282
DQ Mixed 1,434
1,076% 1,441 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 396%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 33.5
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 40.6
SC Mixed 19.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback