Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive429% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 68.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 321
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 970
94% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 130D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1740 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 15.9
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 12.2
13% 16.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
656GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3041 2322 1850 1896 1910 1893 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
429% Outstanding
Read 2,817
Write 3,329
Mixed 3,063
SusWrite 2,152
641% 2,840 MB/s
4K Read 82.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 120
393% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,602
DQ Write 1,197
DQ Mixed 1,343
1,020% 1381 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 429%
Great: 444%
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
379GB free
Firmware: GXA7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2405 2251 1783 1784 1769 1777 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,551
Write 2,393
Mixed 2,327
SusWrite 1,961
520% 2,308 MB/s
4K Read 74.5
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 106
351% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,756
DQ Write 1,338
DQ Mixed 1,451
1,111% 1,515 MB/s
Poor: 192%
This bench: 400%
Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 33.8
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 19.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback