Lenovo 4524BL8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4524BL8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory6.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 13:08
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 162
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 278
41% 299 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 43.2
Parallax 39.9
31% 40.5 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 29
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 85 81 53 49 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 382
Write 99.1
Mixed 208
SusWrite 82.1
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 13.5
57% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 39.3
DQ Mixed 26.9
31% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
131GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 108
Write 118
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 112
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 14.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4524BL8 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4524BL8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback