PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W520 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3167-A1 |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680x1050x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20141201 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '22 at 15:08 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$88
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 92 118 136 140 143 MB/s
|
32.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1240 V2Intel $345Bench 71%, 4,997 samples | 16x |
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples | 12x |
Xeon E3-1245 V2Intel $368Bench 73%, 2,442 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 800 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $380 |