Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W520  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3167-A1
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 16:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 168
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 493
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 32.7
27% 33.1 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 23.1
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$45
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 2.4 22 28 15 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 416
Write 347
Mixed 239
SusWrite 66.3
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 14.7
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 61.4
DQ Mixed 36.6
40% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U7BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W520 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W520

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback