Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 06:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 646
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 120
49% 85.2 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 32.8
55% 73.1 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8H40104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1123 1088 1000 965 838 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 1,023
Mixed 827
SusWrite 911
230% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 26
183% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 475
440% 673 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 196%
Great: 244%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
223GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 432 429 435 398 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 497
Write 368
Mixed 380
SusWrite 391
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 13
80% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 25.4
81% 172 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 25.3
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback