HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Performance Results

Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8599
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200730
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 06 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 246
74% 141 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 564
65% 504 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8599) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.8
7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 316 305 308 307 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 927
Write 900
Mixed 839
SusWrite 329
168% 749 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 51.3
168% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 676
521% 710 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 142%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G6 MT Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop 78%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback