Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 04:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 144
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 455
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1631 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 127
Parallax 110
91% 117 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 108
Splatting 100
85% 104 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 181 96 61 60 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 195
Write 125
Mixed 125
SusWrite 109
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 17.1
70% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 41.5
DQ Mixed 25.5
22% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
210GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 76.2
Write 97.3
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 98.5
57% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback