Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 11:33
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 170
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 455
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 118
Parallax 104
83% 108 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.3
80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 169 63 63 63 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 171
Write 114
Mixed 139
SusWrite 104
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 21.1
81% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 28
23% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
431GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 122 122 121 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 117
Write 129
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 122
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback