Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics81.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$139
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 462
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.1% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
82% 107 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.5
80% 98.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 75 1.2 92 95 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.1% Below average
Read 207
Write 139
Mixed 146
SusWrite 75.2
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 21.5
80% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 26.5
23% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
152GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 117 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 104
Write 72
Mixed 45.1
SusWrite 116
62% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 88%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 9
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 2.7
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
23% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-HA65M-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback