Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 72.7 1-Core 150 2-Core 284 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 720 76% 610 Pts	64-Core 872 54% 872 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 83.2 Parallax 6 4% 31.5 fps	MRender 8.8 Gravity 6.1 Splatting 7.2 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,335 Write 312 Mixed 298 139% 648 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 52.5 183% 69 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 229 172% 233 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-097.A00G 2x8GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	MC Read 38.4 MC Write 39.2 MC Mixed 31.4 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 39.5 SC Mixed 18.9 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	68x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	54x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	41x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	31x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	27x

SSD
NVMe SSD 512GBNetacBench 203%, 1,247 samples	41x
NVMe SSD 1TBNetacBench 221%, 848 samples	10x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	8x

RAM
BL8G32C16S4B.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 326 samples	25x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 2x8GBCrucialBench 93%, 177 samples	14x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 579 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16