Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400H 35,470 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 72.1 1-Core 139 2-Core 228 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 557 58% 464 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.17% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 82.2 Parallax 5.3 4% 30.6 fps	MRender 7.6 Gravity 5.5 Splatting 6.4 5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.17% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,644 Write 1,617 Mixed 1264 336% 1,509 MB/s	4K Read 65.2 4K Write 206 4K Mixed 95.3 330% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 779 DQ Write 584 DQ Mixed 277 317% 547 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 277%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-097.A00G 2x8GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	MC Read 38 MC Write 36.7 MC Mixed 31 101% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 15 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 96.6 41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples	67x
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples	54x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples	41x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples	31x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	27x

SSD
NVMe SSD 512GBNetacBench 203%, 1,247 samples	41x
NVMe SSD 1TBNetacBench 221%, 848 samples	9x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	8x

RAM
BL8G32C16S4B.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 326 samples	25x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 2x8GBCrucialBench 93%, 177 samples	14x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 579 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16