GAME SLAYER XL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGAME SLAYER XL  (all builds)
MotherboardGAME XL
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 22:19
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
94% 178 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 828
84% 678 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 6.1
4% 31.3 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 573 542 543 207 280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1313
Write 808
Mixed 331
SusWrite 411
158% 716 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 56.7
216% 87.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 350
287% 400 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 163%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-097.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 31.4
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 18.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 96.5
41% 96.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SLAYER XL Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: GAME SLAYER XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback