HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 86.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 291
96% 176 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 1,152
100% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
HP(103C 8550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 210
Reflection 207
Parallax 234
171% 217 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 212
Splatting 158
169% 214 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 676 541 480 464 494 461 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1260
Write 945
Mixed 876
SusWrite 519
201% 900 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 71.2
241% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,102
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 743
641% 946 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 204%
Great: 216%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
320GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 300 323 219 284 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 366
Write 455
Mixed 355
SusWrite 285
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 38.4
159% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 221
199% 304 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 117%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
166GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 232 162 165 162 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 436
Mixed 398
SusWrite 228
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 51.1
180% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 196
154% 218 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 128%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
3TB free
Firmware: LEGNT3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 135 132 132 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 178
Write 184
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 130
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.5
310% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 136%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
630GB free
Firmware: LEGNT3D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 155 154 155 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 243
Mixed 103
SusWrite 158
135% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.4
299% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 136%
JMicron Generic DISK04 129,986.5TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 167 180 182 152 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 176
Write 182
Mixed 119
SusWrite 167
218% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1
213% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 71%
JMicron Generic DISK05 129,986.5TB
352GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 45 46 38 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
Read 89
Write 95.1
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 46.8
110% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
133% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32%
Great: 44%
JMicron Generic DISK07 129,986.5TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 45 46 38 47 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
Read 180
Write 175
Mixed 143
SusWrite 47
177% 136 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
154% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
JMicron Generic DISK02 129,986.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 51 45 47 38 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 113
Write 117
Mixed 138
SusWrite 45.5
140% 103 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.2
250% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK00 129,986.5TB
741GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 45 46 38 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 95.9
SusWrite 46.8
115% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
140% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK01 129,986.5TB
283GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 87.4
Write 92
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 93.5
123% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
132% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK03 129,986.5TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 169
Write 175
Mixed 178
SusWrite 93.5
208% 154 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.2
254% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 67%
JMicron Generic DISK06 129,986.5TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 95 95 94 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
Read 157
Write 151
Mixed 130
SusWrite 93.8
177% 133 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
158% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 54%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 92 92 93 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
Read 156
Write 114
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 90.5
139% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 51%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
Read 169
Write 134
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 90.5
151% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE M378A2K43EB1-CWE M378A2G43AB3-CWE Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 27.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 3,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $514
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback