Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i5BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 07:35
Run Duration399 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 534
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 206
Reflection 190
Parallax 205
168% 200 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 150
Splatting 132
123% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
451GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 821 809 825 840 842 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,456
Write 1,440
Mixed 1,141
SusWrite 901
277% 1,234 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 65.5
221% 79.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 818
609% 819 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 218%
Great: 276%
Micron Crucial X8 SSD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 354 351 351 346 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 341
Write 325
Mixed 330
SusWrite 346
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 34
113% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 164
119% 153 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 93%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 67 69 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 152
Write 145
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 67.8
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 67 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 67.4
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate D3 Station 3TB
3TB free, PID 6124
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 68.1
138% 104 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
209% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 189
Write 196
Mixed 122
SusWrite 69
187% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
245% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate D3 Station 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 6124
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 68 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 68
SusWrite 67.9
118% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.7
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 79%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
12.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 199
Write 200
Mixed 182
SusWrite 69.2
214% 162 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 2.9
273% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 103%
JMicron Generic DISK00 129,986.5TB
2GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.1
Write 33.1
Mixed 24.8
39% 31 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
113% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 75%
JMicron Generic DISK01 129,986.5TB
10GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 31.5
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 0.1
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
120% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK02 129,986.5TB
92GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 34.9
Write 32.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 4.4
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK03 129,986.5TB
186GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 35 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 31.6
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 33.8
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 67%
JMicron Generic DISK04 129,986.5TB
404GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 34 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 31.4
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 35.8
42% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 13.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback