Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 15:36
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 76
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 452
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1508 MHz, MLim: 1805 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 65.2
50% 66.6 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 57.6
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 388 389 401 127 20 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 456
Write 405
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 273
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 0.9
70% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 81.5
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 8.4
50% 108 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
14GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 95
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 89.6
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 212 210 218 218 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 189
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 212
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
910GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 23.8
Write 24.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 29.8
36% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 16
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback