Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 140
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 453
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 67.9
47% 64.9 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 54
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 385 393 349 337 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 478
Write 400
Mixed 380
SusWrite 322
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 18.6
78% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 93.2
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 28.2
60% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
14GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 98 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 95.2
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 89.4
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 211 211 216 212 216 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 193
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 212
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
ST1000LM 048-2E7172 1TB
910GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 30 30 29 29 30 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 24.6
Write 25.3
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 29.1
36% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 15.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback