Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 91
2-Core 206
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 528
57% 455 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
PwrHis(1787 2309) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.8
4% 5.9 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 5
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 96 112 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 112
Write 114
Mixed 69
SusWrite 109
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 70%
CT240BX5 00SSD1 240GB
108GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 299 286 288 288 288 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
268% Outstanding
Read 301
Write 286
Mixed 256
SusWrite 295
386% 284 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 50.3
4K Mixed 16.7
2,359% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 18.8
2,836% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 174%
This bench: 268%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback