Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V9.2
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 17:05
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 709
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 862
53% 862 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 872B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 37.1
29% 39.6 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.3
27% 34 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$80
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 135 112 110 111 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,131
Write 238
Mixed 336
SusWrite 137
100% 461 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 44.6
175% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 132
132% 217 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 119%
Great: 241%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
23GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 50 77 92 82 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 1.5
Write 59.4
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 66.4
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.7% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 19.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback