Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory55.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '22 at 03:40
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 683
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
154% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 199
Parallax 251
170% 219 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 219
Splatting 155
162% 205 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 154%
Great: 174%
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2011) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 150
Parallax 8.7
5% 54.9 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.7
8% 10 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
642GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 1630 1614 1632 1740 1029 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 1,818
Mixed 1,407
SusWrite 1,528
344% 1,517 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68.8
223% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 986
750% 1,025 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 262%
Great: 365%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
688GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1851 1889 1857 1749 1491 1332 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1,961
Mixed 1,506
SusWrite 1,695
408% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 60.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 76.4
250% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 935
713% 976 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 309%
Great: 435%
SSK 512GB
166GB free
Firmware: 0212
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 39 38 40 39 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.1% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 24.6
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 39
8% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 12.9
43% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 13.6
11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 27.3
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 28
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback