Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	19.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	8.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 06:51
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 419 34% 300 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q) 10,818 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Device(1A58 2005) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.5% Excellent	Lighting 99.3 Reflection 108 Parallax 110 81% 106 fps	MRender 147 Gravity 94.4 Splatting 92.1 89% 111 fps
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 769 197 166 203 197 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 790 Write 1,580 Mixed 668 SusWrite 288 188% 832 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 66.6 4K Mixed 46.6 149% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 659 DQ Write 529 DQ Mixed 611 453% 600 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 435%
SSK 512GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 250GB free Firmware: 0206 SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 513 518 519 527 534 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 574 Write 503 Mixed 538 SusWrite 514 120% 532 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 35.1 4K Mixed 29.9 100% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 99.1 82% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 91%
CalDigit Card Reader 125GB 74GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 102 102 78 106 107 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.6% Average	Read 145 Write 45.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 94 91% 78 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.5 105% 3.43 MB/s

WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 97 90 91 88 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 82.7 Write 93 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 91.6 111% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.2 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 10,266 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	83.6% Excellent	MC Read 31 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 29.4 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 20.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,071x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	597x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,755x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16