MSI GL75 Leopard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI GL75 Leopard  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-17E7
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 50.8
51% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 212
24% 187 Pts
64-Core 243
15% 243 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 137
Parallax 90.1
77% 107 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 116
Splatting 103
97% 120 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 220 198 180 158 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 926
Write 429
Mixed 383
SusWrite 200
107% 484 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 32.2
134% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 234
179% 241 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 101%
Great: 206%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 220 211 214 213 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 481
Write 344
Mixed 356
SusWrite 230
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 22.1
111% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 242
191% 263 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 17.4
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 18.2
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E7 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GL75 Leopard - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback