MSI GL75 Leopard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMSI GL75 Leopard  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-17E7
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 280
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 877
87% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 118
Parallax 124
102% 122 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 116
Splatting 104
97% 121 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 175 167 162 170 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 162
Mixed 323
SusWrite 169
86% 395 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 40.2
151% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 139
152% 263 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 108%
Great: 206%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 217 214 214 214 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 446
Mixed 364
SusWrite 227
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 40.2
138% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 254
214% 312 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 24.2
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E7 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GL75 Leopard - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback