MSI GL75 Leopard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI GL75 Leopard  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-17E7
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '22 at 05:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 73.4
2-Core 117
55% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 182
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 12B9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.7% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 118
Parallax 133
89% 120 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 116
Splatting 104
97% 121 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 219 201 212 157 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 421
Mixed 452
SusWrite 198
109% 495 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 38.9
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 367
271% 361 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 106%
Great: 206%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 218 221 218 217 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 345
Write 341
Mixed 325
SusWrite 235
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 36.4
124% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 232
174% 234 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E7 Builds (Compare 1,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: MSI GL75 Leopard - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback