HP 750-514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 06:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 378
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2530 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 150
Parallax 154
112% 147 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 144
Splatting 127
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 122 104 109 103 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 427
Write 149
Mixed 177
SusWrite 113
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 34.8
146% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 184
157% 238 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
302GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 144 156 142 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 140
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 140
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback