HP 750-514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 750-514  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '22 at 22:54
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 368
49% 367 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 139
Parallax 144
108% 139 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 134
Splatting 117
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 147 147 138 113 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 462
Write 152
Mixed 179
SusWrite 127
50% 230 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 32.6
147% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 186
159% 240 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
97GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 137 141 146 153 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 147
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 138
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-514 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback