Asrock Z270 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 11:01
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 218
87% 150 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 717
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 764
47% 764 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.7% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 53.7
Parallax 68.5
48% 60.4 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 50.8
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
637GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 475
Write 328
Mixed 338
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 27.8
113% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 53.4
99% 200 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 104%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
238GB free
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 366
Mixed 366
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 34
152% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 113
139% 244 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
ST10000VN0004-1ZD101 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 474
Mixed 484
109% 489 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 34.6
147% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 63.1
116% 231 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
7TB free
Firmware: AR15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 132
Write 132
Mixed 128
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.47
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 131
Mixed 121
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 169
Write 128
Mixed 135
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.18
63% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Taichi Builds (Compare 318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback