Asrock Z270 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 12:44
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 145
2-Core 281
97% 174 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 792
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 67
48% 59.8 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 50.9
50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
639GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 484
Write 288
Mixed 339
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 28
116% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 53.2
97% 195 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 104%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
238GB free
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 362
Mixed 365
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 32.7
156% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 117
143% 250 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 106%
ST10000VN0004-1ZD101 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 481
Mixed 486
111% 496 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 37.4
155% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 64.2
120% 240 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 112%
Great: 108%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
7TB free
Firmware: AR15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 140
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.5
128% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 128
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 180
Write 133
Mixed 129
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 15.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Taichi Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback