Asrock Z270 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 12:55
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$234
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 288
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 765
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Palit(1569 1004) 3GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 70
50% 62.2 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 68
Splatting 53
51% 64.2 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 1TB-$65
639GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 485
Write 248
Mixed 342
79% 359 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 28.2
120% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 54.9
102% 205 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 104%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
238GB free
Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 360
Mixed 370
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 35.6
163% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 112
142% 251 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
ST10000VN0004-1ZD101 512GB
84GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 484
Mixed 484
110% 495 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 38.5
160% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 63.9
126% 254 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 114%
Great: 108%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
7TB free
Firmware: AR15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 142
Write 137
Mixed 139
105% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.76
4K Mixed 0.51
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 137
Write 130
Mixed 119
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 135
Mixed 137
115% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 93%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$219
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$39
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Taichi Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback