Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 161% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 143% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	183% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE (all builds)
Memory	34 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210713
Uptime	20.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration	547 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 93.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 760 74% 606 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% MSI(1462 389B) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	183% Outstanding	Lighting 258 Reflection 280 Parallax 336 210% 291 fps	MRender 318 Gravity 236 Splatting 178 192% 244 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 545GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 911 919 956 915 922 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,251 Write 1,053 Mixed 1,059 SusWrite 910 240% 1,068 MB/s	4K Read 52.8 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 66.7 213% 69.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 869 DQ Mixed 983 726% 956 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,970 Write 1,464 Mixed 1,316 351% 1,583 MB/s	4K Read 42.9 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 62.9 187% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 862 DQ Write 831 DQ Mixed 922 672% 872 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 1,422 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 614 659 671 693 665 662 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	146% Outstanding	Read 981 Write 765 Mixed 538 SusWrite 661 165% 736 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 43.5 147% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 443 DQ Write 490 DQ Mixed 472 354% 468 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 146% Great: 565%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 569GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 426 Write 344 Mixed 398 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 35.2 110% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 255 192% 258 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 20TB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 6TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 392 398 411 391 391 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 385 Write 370 Mixed 206 SusWrite 392 248% 338 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 3.8 1,395% 10 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 254%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$266 1,110 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 785GB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 134 130 135 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 154 Write 147 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 134 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.4 296% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 133%
G-drive USB 6TB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3.5TB free Firmware: 2602 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 185 Write 189 Mixed 78.5 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 128%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,083 Write 30.6 Mixed 66.8 1,236% 1,727 MB/s	4K Read 665 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 4.8 28,286% 224 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
WD WD102KRYZ-01A5AB0 10TB 375 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 9TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 232 Write 232 Mixed 119 144% 194 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.6 371% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 136%
G-drive USB 10TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 939GB free Firmware: 2602 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 138 Write 145 Mixed 102 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.3 322% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 136%
Sabrent Disk Device 250GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 227GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 23 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 136%
Sabrent Disk Device 250GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 232GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 72 74 72 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 67.1 Write 44.7 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 72.6 76% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 136%
Sabrent Disk Device 1TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 41GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.9 5.2 4.5 5.6 5.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 95 Write 69.3 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 6.4 66% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 145%
Sabrent Disk Device 3TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 486GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 23 23 24 24 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 55%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB 6,646 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 889GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,362 Write 35.3 Mixed 77.1 1,236% 1,825 MB/s	4K Read 728 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3.1 2,884% 245 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 26.3 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 25.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 60 67% 60 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X CODE Builds (Compare 1,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	684x
Core i7-8086KIntel $443Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	166x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	134x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	225x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	108x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	83x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	74x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	97x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $857

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16