HP Z4 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z4 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C5
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '20 at 11:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2123
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 645
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
HP(103C 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
42.5% Average
Lighting 52.2
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 48.5
43% 51.9 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 53.4
42% 51.5 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN1T0HAJQ-000H1 1TB
666GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 327 331 324 321 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 454
Write 363
Mixed 373
SusWrite 318
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 79.4
4K Mixed 39.7
140% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 188
106% 100 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 127%
Lacie d2 Quadra v3C 6TB
271GB free
Firmware: 1153
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 117 119 119 119 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Sabrent Disk Device 3TB
29GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 98 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 195
Write 173
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 95.5
175% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%
Sabrent Disk Device 3TB
604GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 98 98 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 155
Write 110
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 95.1
138% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-VK 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 25.4
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 11
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z4 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: HP Z4 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback