Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration313 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 174
2-Core 350
110% 206 Pts
4-Core 692
8-Core 1,143
112% 917 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 204
30% 95.6 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 151
Splatting 124
109% 134 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer FA100 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.R.2Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 357 770 755 617 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 305
Write 784
Mixed 702
SusWrite 551
134% 586 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 12.9
44% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.5
DQ Write 54.4
DQ Mixed 60.5
46% 61.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 243%
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: H190408
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 176 327 320 278 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 348
Write 312
Mixed 260
SusWrite 251
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 14
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 66.6
DQ Write 56.6
DQ Mixed 60.9
46% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 108%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
940GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 307 753 601 500 351 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 416
Write 794
Mixed 112
SusWrite 477
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 14.4
48% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 69.4
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 60.9
46% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 372%
Hs-ssd-e3000 512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: SN07151
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 814 807 813 805 814 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 290
Write 782
Mixed 767
SusWrite 813
152% 663 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.7
43% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 72.9
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 62.6
48% 64.5 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 33.3
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 34.1
101% 35.3 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 3,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback