Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-E  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$36
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 202
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 315
43% 318 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.13 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 289 13 7.3 4.5 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 451
Write 391
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 92.5
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.7
34% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 1.4
20% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$31
163GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 71 70 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 60.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 69.5
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-16-16 D4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-E Builds (Compare 299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback