Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 17:32
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 94.3
1-Core 7
2-Core 14.1
35% 38.5 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 1,189
54% 608 Pts
64-Core 1,695
105% 1,695 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 8825) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 212
Parallax 203
183% 214 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 140
Splatting 122
106% 130 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer FA100 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.R.2Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 714 456 523 409 410 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 330
Write 810
Mixed 711
SusWrite 605
140% 614 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 13
44% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.3
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 60.1
46% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 243%
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: H190408
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 314 225 249 205 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 316
Write 322
Mixed 255
SusWrite 278
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 10.3
43% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.2
DQ Write 55.7
DQ Mixed 61.2
46% 60.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 108%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
940GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1532 582 242 449 355 359 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70% Very good
Read 424
Write 771
Mixed 330
SusWrite 587
120% 528 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 14.2
46% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 70.2
DQ Write 55.6
DQ Mixed 60.3
46% 62 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 70%
Great: 372%
Hs-ssd-e3000 512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: SN07151
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 813 811 814 810 813 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 374
Write 793
Mixed 799
SusWrite 815
159% 695 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.8
43% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 58.2
DQ Mixed 62.4
48% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 33.3
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 3,257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z590-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback