HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 14 '22 at 09:04
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 168 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 326 8-Core 307 43% 316 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.13 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 293 291 284 298 276 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 456 Write 302 Mixed 297 SusWrite 290 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 29.4 104% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 242 208% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 129%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 52GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.8 8.5 8.6 8.4 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 21.7 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 8.6 16% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 67%
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB 962 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 332GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.8 8.5 8.7 8.4 8.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 22.4 Mixed 23 SusWrite 8.6 16% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 77%
Intenso SCSI 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 3TB free Firmware: 0209 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.5 8.4 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 22.7 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 8.6 16% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 79%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 164GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.1 8.2 7.9 8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.99% Terrible	Read 25.2 Write 21.7 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 8.2 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.99% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.4 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,672x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	546x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	276x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	124x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $275

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16