Asrock B460M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B460M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 04:10
Run Duration453 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 226
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 660
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 86
78% 91.7 fps
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 73.2
68% 77.7 fps
Poor: 65% Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 121 123 115 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 424
Mixed 295
SusWrite 152
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56
195% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 78.4
137% 268 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
58GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 317 318 319 315 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 463
Mixed 431
SusWrite 332
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.8
201% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
31GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 156 171 168 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 131
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 156
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 107%
Intenso SCSI 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 143 143 141 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 135
Write 134
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 140
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.7
259% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 79%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB
879GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 103 105 104 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 103
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 4TB
169GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 84 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 115
Write 123
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 83
141% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.C8FF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 28.3
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 23
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B460M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B460M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback