HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 94
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 726
76% 607 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 111
Parallax 126
101% 120 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 113
Splatting 103
104% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
317GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 568 575 423 65 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.9 7.9 8 7.9 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 7.9
17% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
148% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
627GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 105 104 104 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 54.3
Write 94.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 102
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
176% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion HDD 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 99 98 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 67.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 97.5
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: D785
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 20 21 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 20.3
23% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.5
188% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 92%
Intenso SCSI 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 38.7
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 8.6
21% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 79%
Asmt ASMT105x 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 40.2
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 21
23% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
569GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 35 34 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 29
Write 25.7
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 33.1
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.4
259% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 89%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
894GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 30.5
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 8.3
32% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
146GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 35 41 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 45.5
Write 40.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 36.3
51% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
547GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 29.8
Mixed 8
SusWrite 7.8
19% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 59%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB
209GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.3 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 33
Write 33
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 8.5
33% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 25.3
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 25.8
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 59.8
67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback