Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 197
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 504
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1460 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 100
64% 82.3 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 50.4
55% 69.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 109 65 53 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 479
Write 348
Mixed 149
SusWrite 78.9
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 26.3
97% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 93
DQ Mixed 111
103% 165 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 82%
Intenso SCSI 750GB
553GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 88 87 88 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 115
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 85.8
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback