Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 10:37
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 182
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 506
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 68.1
Parallax 99.3
63% 81.6 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 84.9
Splatting 50
55% 69.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 68 54 63 54 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 471
Write 349
Mixed 326
SusWrite 82.1
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 31
105% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 113
133% 231 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 82%
Intenso SCSI 750GB
552GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 89 89 89 89 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 100
Write 115
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 87.1
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback