Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 09:38
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 512
56% 440 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
PowerColor(148C 2377) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1490 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 79.8
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 103
65% 84.1 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 87.8
Splatting 51.5
56% 71.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 76 61 54 64 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 479
Write 346
Mixed 154
SusWrite 77
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 27.1
99% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 111
114% 190 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 82%
Intenso SCSI 750GB
600GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 84 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 42.8
Write 92.5
Mixed 98.4
SusWrite 83.3
60% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback