Gigabyte GA-B560 HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560 HD3  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210304
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700KF-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 264
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 995
93% 775 Pts
64-Core 1545
96% 1545 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 139
Parallax 130
107% 134 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 118
101% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$70
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 363 361 350 397 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 347
Mixed 291
SusWrite 376
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 35
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 279
225% 319 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 119%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
642GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 566 580 566 574 565 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,055
Write 2,218
Mixed 1,921
SusWrite 704
387% 1,725 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 75.6
261% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1276
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 945
714% 973 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 250%
Great: 300%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: DA11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 131 143 162 153 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70% Good
Read 97.7
Write 136
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 146
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70%
Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
208GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 52 52 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 88.1
Write 44
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 52.5
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 153 162 162 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 115
Write 160
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 158
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-05A6B0 1TB
931GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7 7 7.1 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 7
12% 9.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3600 C18 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 25.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 29.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 52.3
76% 52.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560 HD3 Builds (Compare 2,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560 HD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $513
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback