Lenovo 2992E4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2992E4U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 386
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 78.2
Parallax 65.2
60% 72.1 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 70
Splatting 71.8
58% 71 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LAT-128M2S 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PMD9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 190 190 189 177 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 333
Write 190
Mixed 206
SusWrite 185
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 57.5
DQ Mixed 57
46% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 52%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
232GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 247 247 247 248 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 445
Write 199
Mixed 175
SusWrite 247
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 21
86% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 54.3
102% 208 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
167GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 239 239 243 245 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.4% Very good
Read 255
Write 240
Mixed 236
SusWrite 239
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 36.7
117% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
461GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 104 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 92.2
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 103
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-05A6B0 1TB
379GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 43 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 37.9
Write 39.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 42
53% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8GX 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2992E4U Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2992E4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback