Eurocom Racer 2.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemEurocom Racer 2.1  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM RACER 2.1
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 22:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 440
50% 391 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6
Clevo(1558 5105) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1259
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 51.4
Reflection 57.9
Parallax 42.7
42% 50.7 fps
MRender 46.9
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 54.2
42% 50.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC128HBFU-00000 128GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM1201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 229 224 227 228 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.4% Above average
Read 248
Write 229
Mixed 185
SusWrite 228
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 19.5
70% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 113
89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 0443 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Racer 2.1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Eurocom Racer 2.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback