Eurocom Racer 2.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEurocom Racer 2.1  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM RACER 2.1
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 171
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 436
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6
Clevo(1558 5105) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1259
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 48.8
42% 52.7 fps
MRender 47
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 54.5
42% 51 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC128HBFU-00000 128GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM1201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 224 228 225 230 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.2% Above average
Read 248
Write 229
Mixed 186
SusWrite 228
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 19.5
73% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 114
89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 0443 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Racer 2.1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Eurocom Racer 2.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback