Eurocom Racer 2.1

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Eurocom Racer 2.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM RACER 2.1
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121219
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 09 '22 at 07:57
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 175 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 440 48% 378 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla M6 25 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Clevo(1558 5105) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1259 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Lighting 57.2 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 55.8 47% 58.8 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 59.6 48% 59 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPC128HBFU-00000 128GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM1201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 226 226 225 231 230 MB/s Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.3% Above average	Read 250 Write 231 Mixed 190 SusWrite 227 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 19.8 74% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 114 89% 126 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 6.3 5.6 5.4 5.5 5.2 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 38 Write 5.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 5.3 14% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 2.4 131% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 17%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 6.4 6.4 5.7 6 6 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 82.7 Write 14.3 Mixed 23 SusWrite 6.7 31% 31.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.9 68% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 0443 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Racer 2.1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Eurocom Racer 2.1

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	3x

GPU
Tesla M6NvidiaBench 40%, 25 samples	3x

SSD
MZMPC128HBFU-00000 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 108 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 0443 RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GBHynixBench 43%, 13 samples	2x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16