Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 87 2-Core 153 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 392 42% 336 Pts	64-Core 420 26% 420 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.2% Average	Lighting 52 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 55.2 42% 56.2 fps	MRender 58.6 Gravity 57.4 Splatting 50.3 45% 55.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S128G1016 128GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 139 143 98 67 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 399 Write 187 Mixed 185 SusWrite 112 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 23.3 78% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 283 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 186 159% 233 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: 1H20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 114 112 114 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 117 Write 116 Mixed 66 SusWrite 112 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 583GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 27.6 Write 28.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 28.7 20% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965432-068.A 9965432-068.A Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C RMR1781ME68F9 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.5% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 25.7 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 77%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples	6x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	2x
GeForce GT 740NvidiaBench 7%, 30,433 samples	2x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	2x

SSD
S101 250GBFanxiangBench 61%, 73 samples	3x
SD7SB6S128G1016 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 27 samples	2x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $112Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x

RAM
RMR1881ED58E9 Samsung M378B5173DB0- Kingston 9965432-054.A Samsung M378B5173EB0- 16GBUnknownBench 54%, 4 samples	4x
9965432-068.A 9965432-068.A Hynix HMT351U7CFR8C RMR1781ME68F9 16GBKingstonBench 74%, 3 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- Kingston 99U5471-037.A 12GBSamsungBench 42%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16