TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Biostar H510MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H510MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 13:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 580
64% 505 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 27.5
Parallax 38.9
0% 22.2 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 21.6
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 7.16%
 Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0506A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 25 12 18 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 390
Write 183
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 28.1
33% 155 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.6
32% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 62.7
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 0.7
10% 25.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 27.6%
 Great: 102%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
222GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 111 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 91.7
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 112
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 57.3%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 12.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 47.4%
 Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H510MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 327 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar H510MH 2.0

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples61x
Core i3-10100FIntel  $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples60x
Core i5-10400Intel  $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples40x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples54x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples31x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples23x
SSD
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial  $99Bench 200%, 52,084 samples18x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples15x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples13x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples17x
2x16GBAdataBench 87%, 5,790 samples10x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback